Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17340207›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2007

Active integration: new strategies for transgenesis.

Eric T Shinohara, Joseph M Kaminski, David J Segal, Pawel Pelczar, Ravindra Kolhe, Thomas Ryan, Craig J Coates, Malcolm J Fraser, Alfred M Handler, Ryuzo Yanagimachi and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Helper-independent piggyBac plasmids for gene delivery approaches: strategies for avoiding potential genotoxic effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to generate transgenic animals.Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases · 2009
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric T ShinoharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Joseph M Kaminski
David J Segal
Pawel Pelczar
Ravindra Kolhe
Thomas Ryan
Craig J Coates
Malcolm J Fraser
Alfred M Handler
Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Stefan Moisyadi
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USAgricultural Research Service · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Notre Dame · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents novel methods for producing transgenic animals, with a further emphasis on how these techniques may someday be applied in gene therapy. There are several passive methods for transgenesis, such as pronuclear microinjection (PNI) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-Mediated Transgenesis (ICSI-Tr), which rely on the repair mechanisms of the host for transgene (tg) insertion. ICSI-Tr has been shown to be an effective means of creating transgenic animals with a transfection efficiency of approximately 45% of animals born. Furthermore, because this involves the injection of the transgene into the cytoplasm of oocytes during fertilization, limited mosaicism has traditionally occurred using this technique. Current active transgenesis techniques involve the use of viruses, such as disarmed retroviruses which can insert genes into the host genome. However, these methods are limited by the size of the sequence that can be inserted, high embryo mortality, and randomness of insertion. A novel active method has been developed which combines ICSI-Tr with recombinases or transposases to increase transfection efficiency. This technique has been termed "Active Transgenesis" to imply that the tg is inserted into the host genome by enzymes supplied into the oocyte during tg introduction. DNA based methods alleviate many of the costs and time associated with purifying enzyme. Further studies have shown that RNA can be used for the transposase source. Using RNA may prevent problems with continued transposase activity that can occur if a DNA transposase is integrated into the host genome. At present piggyBac is the most effective transposon for stable integration in mammalian systems and as further studies are done to elucidate modifications which improve piggyBac's specificity and efficacy, efficiency in creating transgenic animals should improve further. Subsequently, these methods may someday be used for gene therapy in humans.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGenetic VectorsMiceSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTransfectionViruses

Identifiers

PMID17340207
OpenAlexW2028036259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.