ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2007
Well-devised quantification analysis for duplication mutation of Duchenne muscular dystrophy aimed at preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical application of an NGS-based method in the preimplantation genetic testing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePreimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been performed for deletion and point mutation type of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Our aim was to develop a PGD technique, not yet established, to directly detect duplication mutation instead of substitute diagnosis similar to gender determination.
methodsOur method is based on comparative quantification using conventional duplex PCR, real-time PCR and gender determination. We evaluated this method in single lymphocytes from a duplication type of DMD patient and a normal male.
resultsThere was a significant difference in the mean values of the ratios (the mutation locus/a normal reference): mean value +/- SE was 1.84 +/- 0.15 in the duplication patient, and 1.00 +/- 0.09 in the normal male (p < 0.001).
conclusionIt is suggested that our comparative quantification method could be a new option in PGD for carriers with duplication mutation who wish to have an unaffected son.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.