Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17340095›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2007

Mechanical and structural properties of in vitro neurofilament hydrogels.

S Rammensee, P A Janmey, A R Bausch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A minimal-length approach unifies rigidity in underconstrained materials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Strain-Stiffening in Dynamic Supramolecular Fiber Networks.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S RammenseeBiophysik (E22), Technische Universitaet Muenchen, James-Franck-Strasse, 85747, Garching, Germany.
P A Janmey
A R Bausch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofilaments belong to the class of cytoskeletal intermediate filaments and are the predominant structural elements in axons. They are composed of a semiflexible backbone and highly charged anionic sidearms protruding from the surface of the filaments. Here, the rheology of in-vitro networks of neurofilaments purified from pig spinal cord was determined. The mechanical properties of these networks are qualitatively similar to other hydrogels of semiflexible polymers. The low-deformation storage modulus G'(omega) showed a concentration (c) dependence of G' approximately c (1.3) that is consistent with a model for semiflexible networks, but was also observed for polyelectrolyte brushes. A terminal relaxation was not observed in the frequency range investigated (0.007-5 Hz), supporting the notion that sidearms act as cross-links hindering slip between filaments on a time scale of many minutes. The mesh size distribution of the network was measured by analysis of Brownian motion of embedded beads. The concentration dependence of the mesh size follows the same power law behaviour as found for F-actin networks, but shows a significantly wider distribution attributable to the smaller persistence length of neurofilaments. The attractive interaction between filaments is increased by addition of Al(3+) ions resulting in a reduction of the linear response regime from strains bigger than 80% to less than 30%.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsHydrogelsIntermediate FilamentsRheologySpinal CordSwineActinsHydrogels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.