Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17336688›Full record

ReviewSeminars in nephrology2007

T cells and B cells in lupus nephritis.

Mary H Foster

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in nephrology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. SHP2: its association and roles in systemic lupus erythematosus.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. First use of cenerimod, a selective S1PLupus science & medicine · 2019
    Article
  14. Autoimmunity and Cancer, the Paradox Comorbidities Challenging Therapy in the Context of Preexisting Autoimmunity.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2019
    Review
  15. Induction Therapy for Lupus Nephritis: the Highlights.Current rheumatology reports · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary H FosterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. mhfoster@duke.edu
Duke University · US

Funding

PROXIMAL DETERMINANTS OF NEPHRITOGENIC AUTOIMMUNITYR01DK047424 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FOSTER, MARY H. · 1995 to 2011
$2.9M
Proximal Determinants of Nephritogenic AutoimmunityR56DK047424 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOSTER, MARY H. · 2008 to 2012
$288k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK047424NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK047424NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK047424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T and B lymphocytes play diverse roles at multiple stages in the development and progression of lupus nephritis. Disruption of T- and B-cell regulatory functions by environmental and genetic influences permits pathogenic effectors to emerge in disease. New insights into the biology of these multifunctional cells offer novel targets for intervention in lupus nephritis and systemic autoimmunity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoantibodiesB-LymphocytesCytokinesHumansImmune ToleranceLupus NephritisT-LymphocytesAutoantibodiesCytokines

Identifiers

PMID17336688
PMCPMC1997284
OpenAlexW2019198812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.