Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17335701›Full record

ReviewEnfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica2007

[Donor-transmitted infections].

Oscar Len, Albert Pahissa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oscar LenServicio Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España. olen@ir.vhebron.net
Albert Pahissa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The defence response to infectious agents is compromised in solid organ recipients because of their immunosuppressive treatment. Transmission of infection from a donor organ can result in dysfunction or loss of the allograft, and may lead to death of the recipient if adequate preventive measures are not taken. This potential risk should be thoroughly assessed, particularly in the case of organs from infected donors, in order to optimize organ use without increasing the incidence of graft dysfunction and recipient morbidity and mortality. This article reviews the current knowledge regarding screening for infection in potential donors and discusses risk-benefit considerations related to the use of organs from infected donors.

Indexed as

Disease Transmission, InfectiousTissue DonorsBacterial InfectionsEmigration and ImmigrationHumansImmunosuppression TherapyInfection ControlInfectionsMycosesParasitic DiseasesPrion DiseasesTissue and Organ ProcurementTransplantation, HomologousTravelVaccinationVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID17335701
PMCPMC7130243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.