Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17335576›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007

A comparative study of S/MAR prediction tools.

Kenneth Evans, Sascha Ott, Annika Hansen, Georgy Koentges, Lorenz Wernisch

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Relationship between DNA replication and the nuclear matrix.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determination of the in vivo structural DNA loop organization in the genomic region of the rat albumin locus by means of a topological approach.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenneth EvansSchool of Crystallography, Birkbeck College, Malet Street, London, UK. k.evans@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk <k.evans@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
Sascha Ott
Annika Hansen
Georgy Koentges
Lorenz Wernisch

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105260799Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundS/MARs are regions of the DNA that are attached to the nuclear matrix. These regions are known to affect substantially the expression of genes. The computer prediction of S/MARs is a highly significant task which could contribute to our understanding of chromatin organisation in eukaryotic cells, the number and distribution of boundary elements, and the understanding of gene regulation in eukaryotic cells. However, while a number of S/MAR predictors have been proposed, their accuracy has so far not come under scrutiny.

resultsWe have selected S/MARs with sufficient experimental evidence and used these to evaluate existing methods of S/MAR prediction. Our main results are: 1.) all existing methods have little predictive power, 2.) a simple rule based on AT-percentage is generally competitive with other methods, 3.) in practice, the different methods will usually identify different sub-sequences as S/MARs, 4.) more research on the H-Rule would be valuable.

conclusionA new insight is needed to design a method which will predict S/MARs well. Our data, including the control data, has been deposited as additional material and this may help later researchers test new predictors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareBase SequenceBinding SitesDNAMolecular Sequence DataNuclear MatrixNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsProtein BindingSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNANuclear Matrix-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17335576
PMCPMC1847452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.