Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17335300›Full record

ReviewDrugs2007

Rupatadine: a review of its use in the management of allergic disorders.

Susan J Keam, Greg L Plosker

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06708520 phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Study to Investigate Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Rupatadine (10 mg) and Its Active Metabolites in Participants With Renal Impairment Compared to Matched Control Participants With Normal Renal Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNoucor Health S.A.Ran2022 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsRenal ImpairmentArmsRupatadine
NCT06736340 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Study to Investigate Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Rupatadine (10 mg) and Its Active Metabolites in Participants With Hepatic Impairment Compared to Matched Control Participants With Normal Hepatic Function.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNoucor Health S.A.Ran2022 to 2025Enrolled26ConditionsHepatic ImpairmentArmsRupatadine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Rupatadine.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel targets and regulatory ordeal by QT interval.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. H1 antihistamines: current status and future directions.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2008
    Article
  15. Antihistaminic effects of rupatadine and PKPD modelling.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Susan J KeamWolters Kluwer Health, Adis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Greg L Plosker
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rupatadine (Rupafin, Rinialer, Rupax, Alergoliber) is a selective oral histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist that has also been shown to have platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist activity in vitro. It is indicated for use in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in patients aged >/=12 years. Clinical trials show that rupatadine is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for allergic rhinitis and CIU. It has a rapid onset of action and a prolonged duration of activity. Importantly, it has no significant effect on cognition, psychomotor function or the cardiovascular system. Once-daily rupatadine significantly improves allergic rhinitis symptoms in patients with SAR, PAR or persistent allergic rhinitis (PER) compared with placebo, and provides similar symptom control to that of loratadine, desloratadine, cetirizine or ebastine. In patients with CIU, longer-term use of rupatadine improves CIU symptoms to a greater extent than placebo. It is as well tolerated as other commonly used second-generation H(1)-receptor antagonists. Thus, the introduction of rupatadine extends the range of oral agents available for the treatment of allergic disorders, including allergic rhinitis and CIU.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAnti-Allergic AgentsCyproheptadineDrug InteractionsHumansHypersensitivityPlatelet Activating FactorRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalUrticariaAnti-Allergic AgentsCyproheptadinePlatelet Activating Factorrupatadine

Identifiers

PMID17335300
OpenAlexW2075154135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.