Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17334783›Full record

ArticlePlanta2007

Transcriptional analysis of petal organogenesis in Gerbera hybrida.

Roosa A E Laitinen, Eija Pöllänen, Teemu H Teeri, Paula Elomaa, Mika Kotilainen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Mini Zinc-Finger Protein (MIF) fromFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  9. Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roosa A E LaitinenDepartment of Applied Biology, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Eija Pöllänen
Teemu H Teeri
Paula Elomaa
Mika Kotilainen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of the molecular interplay, which determines early steps of flower formation has grown considerably during last years. In contrast, genetic actions responsible for how flower organs acquire their size and shape at later phases of organogenesis are still poorly understood. We have exploited the large and anatomically simple Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida var. Terra regina) ray flower petals to describe transcriptional changes during organogenesis. Gerbera 9 K cDNA microarray was utilized to profile gene expression at six different developmental stages of petal organogenesis, at the earliest stage expansion of petals is starting and at the latest stage petals have reached their final size and shape. Genes potentially participating in petal opening were identified based on the similarity in expression with a known marker gene. Our results showed characteristic sets of genes expressed during the cell division and cell expansion phases of petal development. Interestingly, there was a transition stage during which neither cell division nor cell expansion marker genes were abundantly expressed. Moreover, constitutive expression of late petal specific genes indicates that they participate in petal organogenesis throughout the development and they are not involved in stage specific switch points.

Indexed as

AsteraceaeCluster AnalysisFlowersGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic MarkersMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrganogenesisRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticGenetic MarkersRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.