Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17334734›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2007

[Basic treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. Abstaining from rheumatological care and preferring alternative medicine increase the risk of undertreatment].

G Westhoff, A Zink

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G WesthoffForschungsbereich Rheumatologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin. westhoff@drfz.de
A Zink
German Rheumatism Research Centre · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major challenge in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the early initiation and long-term continuation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. A total of 916 RA patients (ACR criteria, disease duration <2 years) were investigated in regard to frequency and reasons for DMARD discontinuation. All patients were under rheumatological care at the start of the observation and almost all were receiving DMARDs at study entry (95%). The proportion decreased to 87% within 3 years. Of the 171 patients without DMARD, 5% abstained due to (planned) pregnancy, 28% due to contraindications and/or severe adverse events and 54% due to remission. Only 12% were non-compliant. Multivariate regression analysis revealed non-specialised care (OR 4.6; 59% CI 3.2-6.7), RF seronegativity (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.8-3.8), no patient education (OR 2.2; CI 95% 1.5-3.4), preference for alternative medicine (OR 8.2; 95% CI 4.0-16.8) and > or =10 years of education (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.7) as independent risks for DMARD abstention. Age, sex, comorbidity or disease activity did not influence adherence to DMARD therapy. Since preference for alternative medicine was the strongest risk predictor, further investigations are needed to determine the characteristics of this preference regarding compliance with DMARD medication in RA. The positive influence of patient education on DMARD continuation emphasizes its importance.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareAgedArthritis, RheumatoidChoice BehaviorComplementary TherapiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePrevalenceRheumatologyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Refusal

Identifiers

PMID17334734
OpenAlexW361391771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.