Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17333534›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2007

Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.

Svetlana A Romanenko, Vitaly T Volobouev, Polina L Perelman, Vladimir S Lebedev, Natalya A Serdukova, Vladimir A Trifonov, Larisa S Biltueva, Wenhui Nie, Patricia C M O'Brien, Nina Sh Bulatova and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The puzzling character of repetitive DNA in Phodopus genomes (Cricetidae, Rodentia).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Svetlana A RomanenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. graf@bionet.nsc.ru
Vitaly T Volobouev
Polina L Perelman
Vladimir S Lebedev
Natalya A Serdukova
Vladimir A Trifonov
Larisa S Biltueva
Wenhui Nie
Patricia C M O'Brien
Nina Sh Bulatova
Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Fengtang Yang
Alexander S Graphodatsky
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Cambridge · GBInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité · FRKunming Institute of Zoology · CNLomonosov Moscow State University · RUSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RUWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary success of rodents of the superfamily Muroidea makes this taxon the most interesting for evolution studies, including study at the chromosomal level. Chromosome-specific painting probes from the Chinese hamster and the Syrian (golden) hamster were used to delimit homologous chromosomal segments among 15 hamster species from eight genera: Allocricetulus, Calomyscus, Cricetulus, Cricetus, Mesocricetus, Peromyscus, Phodopus and Tscherskia (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia). Based on results of chromosome painting and G-banding, comparative maps between 20 rodent species have been established. The integrated maps demonstrate a high level of karyotype conservation among species in the Cricetus group (Cricetus, Cricetulus, Allocricetulus) with Tscherskia as its sister group. Species within the genera Mesocricetus and Phodopus also show a high degree of chromosomal conservation. Our results substantiate many of the conclusions suggested by other data and strengthen the topology of the Muroidea phylogenetic tree through the inclusion of genome-wide chromosome rearrangements. The derivation of the muroids karyotypes from the putative ancestral state involved centric fusions, fissions, addition of heterochromatic arms and a great number of inversions. Our results provide further insights into the karyotype relationships of all species investigated.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsChromosome BandingChromosome MappingChromosome PaintingCricetinaeCytogenetic AnalysisKaryotypingMutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID17333534
OpenAlexW2020669495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.