ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2007
Reflections on the experience of counseling supervision by a team of genetic counselors from the UK.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The state of genetic counseling supervision worldwide: Challenges, practices, and pathways for the future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on supporting individuals with NF1 during pregnancy and decision-making processes.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Counseling supervision for genetic counselors: A proposed outsider witness structure.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- The evolution of genetic counseling graduate education in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic: In the eye of the storm.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- The Dynamics of a Genetic Counseling Peer Supervision Group.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Development, Experience, and Expression of Meaning in Genetic Counselors' Lives: an Exploratory Analysis.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- The impact of supervision training on genetic counselor supervisory identity development.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- A model for peer experiential and reciprocal supervision (PEERS) for genetic counselors: development and preliminary evaluation within clinical practice.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- "It's challenging on a personal level"--exploring the 'lived experience' of Australian and Canadian prenatal genetic counselors.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
- What do genetic counselors learn on the job? A qualitative assessment of professional development outcomes.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
- An investigation of genetic counselor experiences in peer group supervision.Journal of genetic counseling · 2008Article
- Letter to the editor journal of genetic counseling. When you care enough to do your very best: genetic counselor experiences of compassion fatigue.Journal of genetic counseling · 2008Article
- Report from the UK and Eire Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) supervision working group on genetic counselling supervision.Journal of genetic counseling · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite it being generally acknowledged that counseling supervision is a vital part of the work for experienced genetic counselors and not just students, not all practising genetic counselors in the United Kingdom and Eire have access to this yet. This case study documents the supervision experience of our team of genetic counselors from Cambridge in the U.K. We document our retrospective thoughts on working practice before supervision was available in our department. We also give an overview of the individual and collective views of having one-to-one supervision only and then one year later, the impact of adding group supervision. Our 'supervision journey' is recorded using a practitioner-centred approach with a mixed method of data collection. Two focus group discussions and two written questionnaires were used, at different time points to gather attitudes. This paper captures experiences as our practice of supervision has evolved. This work is relevant to practising genetic counselors around the world who either do not yet have access to supervision, are planning its implementation or else are adding different types of supervision to their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.