Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17332880›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2007

Infectious disease, the innate immune response, and fibrosis.

Alessia Meneghin, Cory M Hogaboam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Parallel origins and functions of T cells and ILCs.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cardiotoxicity of Cancer Treatments: Focus on Anthracycline Cardiomyopathy.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hepatosplenic Protective Actions ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessia MeneghinImmunology Program, Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Cory M Hogaboam

Funding

SCOR IN THE PATHOBIOLOGY OF FIBROTIC LUNG DISEASEP50HL056402 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TOEWS, GALEN B · 1997 to 2006
$13.3M
IL-13 Fusion Cytotoxin as a Targeted Therapeutic for IIPR01HL073728 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOGABOAM, CORY M. · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
Therapeutic Targeting of RANTES/CCL5 in Fungal Asthma.R01HL069865 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOGABOAM, CORY M. · 2003 to 2006
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL056402NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL56402NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069865NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073728NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL69865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unrelenting and destructive progression of most fibrotic responses in the pulmonary, cardiovascular, integumentary, and alimentary systems remains a major medical challenge for which therapies are desperately needed. The pathophysiology of fibrosis remains an enigma, but considerable research and debate surrounds the question of whether chronic inflammation is the key driver of unrestrained wound healing (i.e., the fibrotic response) in these and other organ systems. This Review describes how infectious pathogens, chronic inflammation, and unrestrained fibroproliferation are likely to be part of a dynamic, unrelenting process propelling human fibrotic diseases.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateCicatrixCommunicable DiseasesFibrosisHumansWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID17332880
PMCPMC1804377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.