ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007
Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04204109 (Interprofessional Versus Monoprofessional Case-based Learning in Childhood Cancer and the Effect on Healthcare Professionals' Interprofessional Attitudes), which is not on this map. Cited by 531 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interprofessional Versus Monoprofessional Case-based Learning in Childhood Cancer and the Effect on Healthcare Professionals' Interprofessional Attitudes: a Randomized Trial
Who cites it
531 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Initial programme theory developing for interprofessional case discussions (InCaD) in acute hospital care: a realist approach.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing complex interventions: a systematic review of outcomes used in randomised controlled trials on STI partner notification in high-income countries.BMC public health · 2023Pooled it
- Dance movement therapy for dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of vascular screening interventions on perceived threat, efficacy beliefs and behavioural intentions: a systematic narrative review.Health promotion international · 2023Pooled it
- Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of home healthcare on end-of-life outcomes for people with dementia: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions-A review of the literature.Nursing open · 2020Pooled it
- Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- When piloting health services interventions, what predicts real world behaviours? A systematic concept mapping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Pooled it
- Exercise versus no exercise for the occurrence, severity, and duration of acute respiratory infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Pay for performance for hospitals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The effectiveness of peer-supported interventions for encouraging dietary behaviour change in adults: a systematic review.Public health nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Staff experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Questionnaires that measure the quality of relationships between patients and primary care providers: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Universal prevention through a digital health platform reduces injury incidence in youth athletics (track and field): a cluster randomised controlled trial.British journal of sports medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Process evaluation of a brief messaging intervention to improve diabetes treatment adherence in sub-Saharan Africa.BMC public health · 2021Trial
- A Smart Shoe Insole to Monitor Frail Older Adults' Walking Speed: Results of Two Evaluation Phases Completed in a Living Lab and Through a 12-Week Pilot Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Trial
471 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.