Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17332136›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2007

Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments.

Eja Pedersen, Kerstin Persson Waye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The influence of wind turbine visibility on the health of local residents: a systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Impacts of Housing Characteristics and Built-Environment Features on Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Health Effects Related to Wind Turbine Sound: An Update.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  14. Subjective Evaluation on the Annoyance of Environmental Noise Containing Low-Frequency Tonal Components.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of low-frequency noise from wind turbines under different weather conditions.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2020
    Article
  17. Wind Turbine Noise and Sleep: Pilot Studies on the Influence of Noise Characteristics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Response to Noise Emitted by Wind Farms in People Living in Nearby Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Derivation and application of a composite annoyance reaction construct based on multiple wind turbine features.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eja PedersenOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden. eja.pedersen@set.hh.se
Kerstin Persson Waye

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise among people living near the turbines, and to study relations between noise and perception/annoyance, with focus on differences between living environments.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in seven areas in Sweden across dissimilar terrain and different degrees of urbanisation. A postal questionnaire regarding living conditions including response to wind turbine noise was completed by 754 subjects. Outdoor A-weighted sound pressure levels (SPLs) were calculated for each respondent. Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise in relation to SPLs was analysed with regard to dissimilarities between the areas.

resultsThe odds of perceiving wind turbine noise increased with increasing SPL (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.40). The odds of being annoyed by wind turbine noise also increased with increasing SPLs (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25). Perception and annoyance were associated with terrain and urbanisation: (1) a rural area increased the risk of perception and annoyance in comparison with a suburban area; and (2) in a rural setting, complex ground (hilly or rocky terrain) increased the risk compared with flat ground. Annoyance was associated with both objective and subjective factors of wind turbine visibility, and was further associated with lowered sleep quality and negative emotions.

conclusionThere is a need to take the unique environment into account when planning a new wind farm so that adverse health effects are avoided. The influence of area-related factors should also be considered in future community noise research.

Indexed as

Energy-Generating ResourcesWindAffectAuditory PerceptionCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental PollutionFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNoisePressureRural PopulationSleep Wake DisordersSweden

Identifiers

PMID17332136
PMCPMC2078467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.