Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17329656›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of public health2007

Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lenny R Vartanian, Marlene B Schwartz, Kelly D Brownell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of public health, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02347267 (The Impact of Reduction in Consumption of Caloric and no Caloric Sweetened Beverages on Weight, Body Composition and Blood Pressure in Young Adults.), which is not on this map. Cited by 616 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
616citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02347267 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Reduction in Consumption of Caloric and no Caloric Sweetened Beverages on Weight, Body Composition and Blood Pressure in Young Adults.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador ZubiranRan2012 to 2014Enrolled148ConditionsObesity and OverweightArmsCaloric and non-caloric SSBS reduction, Caloric SSBS reduction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

616 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Camel (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Impacts of the 2008 Great Recession on dietary intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Prompting consumers to make healthier food choices in hospitals: a cluster randomised controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Trial
  15. Who pays and Who benefits? A distributional health-economic evaluation of strengthening the UK soft drinks industry levy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. How does the Kids SIPAmerican journal of agricultural economics · 2026
    Article
  18. Development of the Muscular and Skeletal System During Adolescence.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

556 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lenny R VartanianDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Conn 06520-8205, USA.
Marlene B Schwartz
Kelly D Brownell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a meta-analysis of 88 studies, we examined the association between soft drink consumption and nutrition and health outcomes. We found clear associations of soft drink intake with increased energy intake and body weight. Soft drink intake also was associated with lower intakes of milk, calcium, and other nutrients and with an increased risk of several medical problems (e.g., diabetes). Study design significantly influenced results: larger effect sizes were observed in studies with stronger methods (longitudinal and experimental vs cross-sectional studies). Several other factors also moderated effect sizes (e.g., gender, age, beverage type). Finally, studies funded by the food industry reported significantly smaller effects than did non-industry-funded studies. Recommendations to reduce population soft drink consumption are strongly supported by the available science.

Indexed as

Body WeightCarbonated BeveragesNutritional StatusAnimalsCalcium, DietaryChronic DiseaseDiabetes MellitusDrinking BehaviorEnergy IntakeHumansIndustryMilkRisk FactorsSample SizeCalcium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID17329656
PMCPMC1829363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.