ArticlePloS one2007
Evidence for active maintenance of inverted repeat structures identified by a comparative genomic approach.
Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Protein innovation through template switching in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineage.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Coding palindromes in mitochondrial genes of Nematomorpha.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- How quantum entanglement in DNA synchronizes double-strand breakage by type II restriction endonucleases.Journal of theoretical biology · 2016Article
- The role of short RNA loops in recognition of a single-hairpin exon derived from a mammalian-wide interspersed repeat.RNA biology · 2015Article
- Francisella tularensis Subtype A.II Genomic Plasticity in Comparison with Subtype A.I.PloS one · 2014Article
- Intercellular and systemic movement of RNA silencing signals.The EMBO journal · 2011Review
- Transport of sequence-specific RNA interference information between cells.Annual review of genetics · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inverted repeats have been found to occur in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Usually they are short and some have important functions in various biological processes. However, long inverted repeats are rare and can cause genome instability. Analyses of C. elegans genome identified long, nearly-perfect inverted repeat sequences involving both divergently and convergently oriented homologous gene pairs and complete intergenic sequences. Comparisons with the orthologous regions from the genomes of C. briggsae and C. remanei show that the inverted repeat structures are often far more conserved than the sequences. This observation implies that there is an active mechanism for maintaining the inverted repeat nature of the sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.