ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2006
Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions: use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04162288 (RCT Protocol for Evaluating an Online Training Program on Shared Decision-making About Screening for Down Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
RCT Protocol for Evaluating an Online Training Program on Shared Decision-making About Screening for Down Syndrome
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Decision-making and related outcomes of patients with complex care needs in primary care settings: a systematic literature review with a case-based qualitative synthesis.BMC primary care · 2022Pooled it
- Randomized Clinical Trial of the Four Supports Intervention for Surrogate Decision-Makers in Intensive Care Units.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Trial
- A Randomized Control Trial of a Digital Health Tool for Safer Firearm and Medication Storage for Patients with Suicide Risk.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Trial
- Goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients with TBI: Development and feasibility testing.Neurology · 2020Trial
- The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice.BMC family practice · 2010Trial
- Clinician Considerations Regarding Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.JAMA surgery · 2026Article
- Trust As the Foundation for Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Protocol for a randomized trial of a scalable, interactive tool to support surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Working with a Chronic Health Condition: Is Choosing Not to Disclose the Same as Hiding Information?Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Development and acceptability testing of a tracheostomy decision support video for parents.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Clinical decision-making frameworks for pandemic preparedness and response: A scoping review.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Review
- Why are Disclosure Decisions so Difficult? Understanding Factors that Encourage and Discourage Workers with a Chronic Disabling Condition from Disclosing Health Information at Work.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Article
- Deep deterministic policy gradient-based automatic negotiation framework for shared decision-making.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Medication decision making under uncertainty: Considering chronic disease and pregnancy potential.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Shared Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Survey of Current Barriers in Practice Among Clinicians Across China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Co-design and usability of an interactive web-based fertility decision aid for transgender youth and young adults.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Experiences and needs of older patients with stroke in China involved in rehabilitation decision-making: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Reducing Firearm Access for Suicide Prevention: Implementation Evaluation of the Web-Based "Lock to Live" Decision Aid in Routine Health Care Encounters.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate family physicians' views on factors that make health care decisions difficult for patients, interventions family physicians use to support patients making decisions, and interventions proposed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF).
designThirteen group discussions.
settingFive family practice units.
participantsOne hundred twenty family physicians.
interventionsThe multifaceted implementation intervention consisted of feedback from participants, a reminder at point of care, and an interactive workshop. During the workshop, family physicians were asked about their views on 2 videos both showing the concluding phase of a simulated clinical encounter with a woman facing a decision about hormone therapy. One video showed usual care; the other showed use of the ODSF process and related tools. Content was analyzed using observations by non-participants, field notes, material collected from participants during workshops, evaluation forms completed at the end of workshops, and comments written on exit questionnaires from the implementation trial.
main outcome measuresFamily physicians' views on the types of difficult decisions their patients face, the factors that make decisions difficult for patients, the interventions family physicians use to support patients' decisions, and the interventions proposed by the ODSF.
resultsThe 2 most frequently cited factors making decisions difficult for patients were experiencing uncertainty and fears about adverse outcomes. Before being introduced to the ODSF, participants had used mostly information-related strategies to provide decision support. After learning about the ODSF, participants overwhelmingly identified assessing patients' values as a priority. At the end of the workshop, the 5 changes in practice participants most frequently intended to make were, in order of importance, to assess patients' values, to ask about patients' preferred role in decision making, to screen for decisional conflict, to assess support or undue pressure on patients, and to increase patients' involvement in decision making.
conclusionThe ODSF process and related tools have the potential to broaden family physicians' views on supporting patients facing difficult decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17327891PMC1481680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.