Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17326337›Full record

Trial reportVascular health and risk management2006

A large scale study of angiotensin II inhibition therapy in an elderly population: the CHANCE study.

Roland Asmar, Sophie Nisse-Durgeat

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vascular health and risk management, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roland AsmarThe Cardiovascular Institute, Paris, France. icv@icv.org
Sophie Nisse-Durgeat
Takeda (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This 8-week, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of candesartan cilexetil (CC, 8-16 mg) in elderly (>65 years) hypertensive patients. Patients (n=3013) received CC 8 mg during 8 weeks which eventually doubled to CC 16 mg at week 4 if blood pressure remained uncontrolled (> or = 140/90 mmHg). At week 8, 65.5% of patients were normalized (BP < 140/90 mmHg). Mean changes at week 8 were -25.8, -13.2, and -12.7 mmHg for systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure, respectively. Age, sex, and diabetic status did not influence the antihypertensive effect of CC. 68% of the patients treated with, but uncontrolled or intolerant of, prior antihypertensive treatment were normalized by CC 8-16 mg. In summary, CC 8-16 mg once daily was effective and well tolerated in the management of arterial hypertension in elderly subjects.

Indexed as

Angiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureDiabetic AngiopathiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleTetrazolesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl Compoundscandesartan cilexetilTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID17326337
PMCPMC1993978
OpenAlexW2051407024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.