Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17325836›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2007

Use of Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in Italian intensive care units: the results of a nationwide survey.

Guido Bertolini, Carlotta Rossi, Abramo Anghileri, Sergio Livigni, Antonio Addis, Daniele Poole

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An update on activated protein C (xigris) in the management of sepsis.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Scientific and clinical challenges in sepsis.Current pharmaceutical design · 2009
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Once is not enough: clinical trials in sepsis.Intensive care medicine · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guido BertoliniLaboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, GiViTi Coordinating Center, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Centro di Ricerche Cliniche per le Malattie Rare Aldo e Cele Daccò, Villa Camozzi, 24020, Ranica (Bergamo), Italy. bertolini@marionegri.it
Carlotta Rossi
Abramo Anghileri
Sergio Livigni
Antonio Addis
Daniele Poole
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITMinistero della Salute · ITOspedale San Giovanni Bosco · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo monitor the use of drotrecogin alfa activated (DrotAA) in Italy and its effects on patients' health.

designProspective pharmaco-surveillance program with a parallel non-randomized control group.

settingThe Ministry of Health required all intensive care units (ICUs) using DrotAA to participate in the pharmaco-surveillance program. Our control group was formed of patients eligible for treatment with DrotAA but who had not received it. PATIENTS AND

participantsThe data we collected included basic demographic characteristics, indications, modalities of use, adverse events, and ICU mortality. We identified potentially non-collaborating centres on the basis of data on DrotAA purchasing by hospitals. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsFrom 2003 to 2006, 668 cases of treatment with DrotAA were reported. We estimate that 79.3% of all patients treated in Italy in this period were recruited. Off-label use was common. Delayed start was the main reason for off-label prescription. Bleeding during infusion occurred in 73 patients (10.9%). The ICU mortality was higher in patients with bleeding (57.5 vs. 44.9%; p=0.041). Crude ICU mortality was lower in patients receiving DrotAA than in controls (46.4 vs. 54.9%; p=0.0004); however, multivariate analysis, which adjusted for certain relevant differences, showed that DrotAA treatment was associated with higher mortality after scheduled surgery.

conclusionsThese results question the way in which the drug is used in everyday clinical practice and its efficacy in a selected subgroup, and reinforce the need for a new, independent, confirmatory trial to reassess the risk-to-benefit ratio of DrotAA.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsDrug Utilization ReviewProtein CAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProspective StudiesRecombinant ProteinsAnti-Infective Agentsdrotrecogin alfa activatedProtein CRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17325836
OpenAlexW2136033290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.