Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17325831›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2007

Impact of bolus application of low-dose hydrocortisone on glycemic control in septic shock patients.

Steffen Weber-Carstens, Maria Deja, Sven Bercker, Anna Dimroth, Olaf Ahlers, Udo Kaisers, Didier Keh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Continuous versus Intermittent Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Hyperglycemia Risk Evaluation of Hydrocortisone Intermittent Boluses vs Continuous Infusion in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Corticosteroids in Acute Lung Injury: The Dilemma Continues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steffen Weber-CarstensClinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum & Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. steffen.weber-carstens@charite.de
Maria Deja
Sven Bercker
Anna Dimroth
Olaf Ahlers
Udo Kaisers
Didier Keh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether glycemic control is less feasible when hydrocortisone is given as a bolus compared with continuous application in septic shock patients.

designObservational prospective pilot study.

settingFourteen-bed surgical university hospital ICU. PATIENTS: Sixteen consecutive patients with septic shock receiving a continuous infusion of 200 mg hydrocortisone/day and an infusion regime of insulin keeping blood glucose below 150 mg/dl.

interventionBlood glucose and insulin infusion were adjusted to steady state before intervention. At baseline, the continuous hydrocortisone infusion was replaced with a single bolus of 50 mg hydrocortisone. During a subsequent 6-h period, blood glucose was monitored hourly and insulin infusion was kept constant. Afterwards, hydrocortisone application and adjustment of blood glucose was resumed according to standard treatment.

resultsMean blood glucose in steady state at baseline immediately prior to intervention was 128 mg/dl (range 114-141 mg/dl; 95% confidence interval). After bolus injection of hydrocortisone, blood glucose increased significantly within 6 h with peak levels of 154 mg/dl (range 132-178 mg/dl; p<0.01). Blood glucose returned to baseline with restoration of continuous hydrocortisone infusion. There were marked inter-individual variations with peak glucose values up to 254 mg/dl, but no significant difference in intra-individual glucose variability before and after bolus injection of hydrocortisone.

conclusionsBolus injections of hydrocortisone may induce significant increases of blood glucose in patients with septic shock. The individual response is highly variable and we speculate that repetitive boluses would induce marked undulation of blood glucose. In terms of glycemic-control strategies, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone seems to be preferable.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycemic IndexHumansHydrocortisoneProspective StudiesShock, SepticAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBlood GlucoseHydrocortisone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.