Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2007
Serologically HLA-DR-mismatched unrelated donors might provide a valuable alternative in allogeneic transplantation: experience from a single japanese institution.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Class II HLA mismatch improves outcomes following haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors for adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphocytic leukemia in first complete-remission.International journal of hematology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To clarify the clinical significance of a serologic HLA-DR mismatch after unrelated-donor transplantation, we evaluated for hematologic malignancies 123 cases of unrelated bone marrow transplantation carried out in a single institution between 1995 and 2004. Of the patients in these cases, 12 were serologically mismatched at the single HLA-DR locus. Eighty-two patients who received HLA-matched transplantations were used as controls. Conditioning consisted of a conventional total body irradiation-based regimen or a fludarabine-based reduced-intensity regimen. Prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) consisted of tacrolimus plus short-term methotrexate. Graft failure did not develop. With a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 11-99 months), rates of overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse at 4 years were 63%, 38%, and 0%, respectively, all of which were comparable with those after HLA-matched transplantation. The frequency of acute GVHD of grades II to IV was 75%, significantly higher than after HLA-matched transplantation (42%, P = .046), and there was a trend toward an increased incidence of acute GVHD of grades III to IV after serologically HLA-DR-mismatched unrelated transplantation (27% versus 10%, P = .093). Chronic GVHD developed in 4 of 11 evaluable patients, an incidence comparable with that after HLA-matched transplantation. In summary, serologically HLA-DR-mismatched unrelated transplantation is feasible and might be an acceptable alternative for the Japanese population, although the higher incidence of acute GVHD is notable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17321996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.