Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17321657›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2007

Ethical challenges in the design and conduct of locally relevant international health research.

Christian Simon, Maghboeba Mosavel, Debbie van Stade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioethics training in Uganda: report on research and clinical ethics workshops.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Procedural challenges in international collaborative research.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian SimonDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. cxs66@case.edu
Maghboeba Mosavel
Debbie van Stade

Funding

Cervical Cancer and the Mother-Daughter RelationshipR03CA113086 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MOSAVEL, MAGHBOEBA · 2005 to 2006
$153k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA113086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we consider some of the challenges associated with the ethical need to conduct locally relevant international health research. We examine a cervical cancer research initiative in a resource-poor community in South Africa, and consider the extent to which this research was relevant to the expressed needs and concerns of community members. Results from informal discussions and a series of 27 focus groups conducted in the community provide insight into the community's needs and concerns, and its recommendations for how the research could be made more relevant to the community. We discuss these findings in the context of recent theory and literature on the role of community engagement in promoting local relevance and responsiveness in community-based health research. We anticipate that the paper's findings may help international health researchers better identify and assess the challenges of conducting locally relevant research across major global gaps in wealth and health.

Indexed as

InternationalityResearch DesignAdolescentBiomedical ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleSouth AfricaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID17321657
PMCPMC3248695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.