Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17319808›Full record

ReviewThe Milbank quarterly2007

Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Richard P T M Grol, Marije C Bosch, Marlies E J L Hulscher, Martin P Eccles, Michel Wensing

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Milbank quarterly, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 374 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
374citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
75.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02840318 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

The Compassion Intervention: A Pilot Study of Enhanced Integrated Care for People With Severe Memory Problems

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2014 to 2015Enrolled41ConditionsDementiaArmsCompassion Intervention
NCT07073898 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2026Enrolled65ConditionsLung CancerArmsRepeated Text Messages (TM+), Conversational Agent (CA), Educational Video, Proactive Patient Navigation (PPN), Reactive Patient Navigation (RPN)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

374 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 971 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

314 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard P T M GrolCentre for Quality of Care Research, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. R.Grol@kwazo.umcn.nl
Marije C Bosch
Marlies E J L Hulscher
Martin P Eccles
Michel Wensing
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLNewcastle University · GBRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consistent finding in articles on quality improvement in health care is that change is difficult to achieve. According to the research literature, the majority of interventions are targeted at health care professionals. But success in achieving change may be influenced by factors other than those relating to individual professionals, and theories may help explain whether change is possible. This article argues for a more systematic use of theories in planning and evaluating quality-improvement interventions in clinical practice. It demonstrates how different theories can be used to generate testable hypotheses regarding factors that influence the implementation of change, and it shows how different theoretical assumptions lead to different quality-improvement strategies.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationSystems AnalysisTotal Quality ManagementDecision Making, OrganizationalHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInterinstitutional RelationsInterprofessional RelationsLearningModels, OrganizationalMotivationOrganizational Culture

Identifiers

PMID17319808
PMCPMC2690312
OpenAlexW2168190331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.