Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17319457›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2006

The use of metoprolol CR/XL in the treatment of patients with diabetes and chronic heart failure.

Ovidio De Freitas, Oliver Lenz, Alessia Fornoni, Barry J Materson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ovidio De FreitasDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33131, USA.
Oliver Lenz
Alessia Fornoni
Barry J Materson
University of Miami · USHypertension Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 5 million Americans suffer from heart failure. Given the correlation of heart failure with age and the rising life expectancy, the prevalence of heart failure continues to increase in the general population. Sympathetic stimulation intensifies with progressive heart failure. The rationale to use beta-blockers in individuals with impaired myocardial function is based on experimental evidence supporting the notion that prolonged alpha- and beta-adrenergic stimulation leads to worsening heart failure. Until recently, safety concerns have precluded the use of beta-blockers in patients with diabetes and heart failure. However, several large, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials such as Metoprolol Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) have shown that beta-blockers can be safely used in patients with diabetes and heart failure. Moreover, beta-blockers significantly improved morbidity and mortality in this population. Based on this evidence, it is now recommended to add beta-blockers such as metoprolol CR/XL with an escalating dosage regimen to the treatment of patients with symptomatic heart failure who already are receiving a stable medical regimen including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, diuretics, vasodilators, or digitalis.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarbazolesCarvedilolChronic DiseaseDelayed-Action PreparationsDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMetoprololPractice Guidelines as TopicPropanolaminesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarbazolesCarvedilolDelayed-Action PreparationsMetoprololPropanolamines

Identifiers

PMID17319457
PMCPMC1994002
OpenAlexW2063199936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.