Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17318914›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2007

Internal pilots for a class of linear mixed models with Gaussian and compound symmetric data.

Matthew J Gurka, Christopher S Coffey, Keith E Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew J GurkaDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0717, USA. mgurka@virginia.edu
Christopher S Coffey
Keith E Muller

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
3D Cerebral Vessel Location for Surgical PlanningR01EB000219 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BULLITT, ELIZABETH · 2002 to 2008
$3.0M
Shape of Subcortical Brain Structures in SchizophreniaP01CA047982 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GERIG, GUIDO · 1988 to 2002
$2.9M
Internal Pilots for Repeated Measure ANOVAR01CA095749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EDWARDS, LLOYD J · 2003 to 2005
$627k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA47 982-04NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095749-01A1NIBIB NIH HHS EB000219NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000219NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018NIEHS NIH HHS T32-ES07018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An internal pilot design uses interim sample size analysis, without interim data analysis, to adjust the final number of observations. The approach helps to choose a sample size sufficiently large (to achieve the statistical power desired), but not too large (which would waste money and time). We report on recent research in cerebral vascular tortuosity (curvature in three dimensions) which would benefit greatly from internal pilots due to uncertainty in the parameters of the covariance matrix used for study planning. Unfortunately, observations correlated across the four regions of the brain and small sample sizes preclude using existing methods. However, as in a wide range of medical imaging studies, tortuosity data have no missing or mistimed data, a factorial within-subject design, the same between-subject design for all responses, and a Gaussian distribution with compound symmetry. For such restricted models, we extend exact, small sample univariate methods for internal pilots to linear mixed models with any between-subject design (not just two groups). Planning a new tortuosity study illustrates how the new methods help to avoid sample sizes that are too small or too large while still controlling the type I error rate.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalNormal DistributionSample SizeCerebral VeinsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingResearch DesignUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17318914
PMCPMC4456690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.