ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2007
Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria V: CT findings and surgical management.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcome of Patients Diagnosed Traumatic Intracranial Epidural Hematoma With Severe Brain Injury (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) Who Undergo Surgery: A Report From the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- Traumatic Epidural and Subdural Hematoma: Epidemiology, Outcome, and Dating.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement.Acta neurochirurgica · 2019Review
- Citicoline in severe traumatic brain injury: indications for improved outcome : A retrospective matched pair analysis from 14 Austrian trauma centers.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2018Article
- Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit discharge predicts the 1-year outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2013Article
- Traumatic brain injury: simple data collection will improve the outcome.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2007Article
- Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcomes of traumatic brain injury: Evidences from integrated level 1 trauma center in India.Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this paper is to describe CT findings and surgical management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in Austria. PATIENTS AND
methodsData sets from 415 patients treated by 5 Austrian hospitals were available. The analysis focused on incidence, surgical management, and outcome of different types of intracranial lesions, and outcome of surgical interventions with and without monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP). For the first analysis we assigned the patients to 16 groups based on the type of lesion as evaluated by CT scan. For the second analysis we created 4 groups based on surgical treatment (yes/no) and ICP monitoring (yes/no).
resultsThe mean age was 48.9 years with a male to female ratio of 299:116. The most frequent single lesions were contusions (CONT) and diffuse brain edema. Combined lesions were far more common than single lesions; the most frequently observed combinations included CONT and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with or without subdural hematoma (SDH). Surgery was done in 276 (66.5%) patients. Osteoplastic surgery (OPS; n = 221) was the most common method followed by osteoclastic surgery (OCS; n = 91) and decompressive craniectomy (DEC; n = 15). ICU mortality was 29.7% for all patients who had any kind of surgery, which was lower than that of patients who were treated non-operatively (33.1%). The ICU mortality of patients with SDH was lower with OCS (18.8%) than with OPS (36.0%). Patients who received ICP monitoring but did not require surgery had the lowest 90 day mortality (17.5%).
conclusionsICP monitoring seems to be beneficial in both operatively and non-operatively treated patients with severe TBI. Patients with SDH who were operated on had significantly better outcomes. In patients with SDH, their outcome after osteoclastic surgery was significantly better than after osteoplastic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17318751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.