Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17318449›Full record

Trial reportJournal of genetic counseling2007

Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

C Phelps, F Wood, P Bennett, K Brain, J Gray

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of genetic counseling, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. What matters to you? - Free-text comments in a questionnaire from patients undergoing radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient perspectives on delays in diagnosis and treatment of cancer: a qualitative analysis of free-text data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C PhelpsInstitute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK. ceri.phelps@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk
F Wood
P Bennett
K Brain
J Gray
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment have been found to have a poor understanding of the process, which may affect how well they cope with learning their risk. This paper reports free-text data from questionnaires completed by women undergoing a randomised controlled trial of a psychological intervention. Of the 268 women undergoing genetic assessment for familial breast/ovarian cancer risk who were invited to take part in the trial, 157 women returned research questionnaires. Of these, 97 women provided free-text comments upon referral to a cancer genetics clinic, 62 provided comments whilst waiting for risk information (average, moderate or high), and 36 women provided comments following notification of risk. This paper reports a thematic analysis of the free-text data. Themes reflected individuals' poor knowledge and uncertainty about genetic risk assessment. How well individuals responded to learning their risk depended upon whether expectations had been met. Regardless of risk, individuals undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment are likely to benefit from increased information about its process and timescales, and access to increased psychological support. Free-text comments can provide valuable data about individuals' expectations and knowledge of genetics services.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingDefense MechanismsFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPamphlets

Identifiers

PMID17318449
OpenAlexW2105256794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.