ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2007
The Cochrane Library as a resource for evidence on out-of-hospital health care interventions.
Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paramedic literature search filters: optimised for clinicians and academics.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveAlthough the Cochrane Library is promoted as a rigorous source of evidence, the relevance of this evidence to the out-of-hospital setting has not been assessed. The objective of this study is to identify existing controlled trials and systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library that have been conducted in or are relevant to out-of-hospital health care. The scope of out-of-hospital care, the years and trends of out-of-hospital research publication, and the journals of publication are also examined.
methodsUsing a search strategy developed by the Cochrane Prehospital and Emergency Health Field, 2 reviewers searched issue 4, 2005 of the Cochrane Library to identify reports of controlled trials and systematic reviews on out-of-hospital interventions. Three independent reviewers screened the titles identified by the search strategy and applied predetermined criteria to classify the reported study as out-of-hospital based or not out-of-hospital based. The out-of-hospital-based studies were then categorized as randomized or nonrandomized trials.
resultsScreening of the 19,759 titles retrieved by the search strategy identified 4,016 studies that were potentially out-of-hospital based. Abstract and full-text analysis of the 4,016 studies identified 400 reports of trials and 13 reviews or protocols that were out-of-hospital based. Of the 400 reports of trials identified, 299 (75%) were randomized trials. The number of out-of-hospital trials published increased steadily from the 1970s to the late 1990s, with the majority of trials (63%) covering interventions related to resuscitation and cardiac care. Annals of Emergency Medicine published more out-of-hospital trials than any other journal, followed by Resuscitation and Journal of the American Medical Association.
conclusionThe Cochrane Library provides a useful resource of health care evidence; however, the relatively small number of out-of-hospital-based systematic reviews and trials does not comprehensively cover the broad scope of out-of-hospital health care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.