Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17317219›Full record

ArticleJournal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology2008

Effects of stimulation frequency versus pulse duration modulation on muscle fatigue.

Trisha Kesar, Li-Wei Chou, Stuart A Binder-Macleod

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06127602 (NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation to Facilitate Perturbation-based REACtive Balance Training for Fall Risk Reduction Post-stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06127602 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation to Facilitate Perturbation-based REACtive Balance Training for Fall Risk Reduction Post-stroke: The REACTplusNMES Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2024 to 2027Enrolled46ConditionsStroke, Ischemic, Stroke Hemorrhagic, Stroke, CerebrovascularArmsReactive balance training with Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Reactive balance training without Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of stimulation frequency on neuromuscular fatigue.European journal of applied physiology · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Reinforcement Learning Agent Trained as FES Controller in Modified Xia-Law Simulation Robustly Controls Grip Force.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in neuroprosthetic management of foot drop: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trisha KesarDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Li-Wei Chou
Stuart A Binder-Macleod

Funding

Robotic Exoskeletons, FES, and Biomechanics: Treating Movement DisordersR01HD038582 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BINDER-MACLEOD, STUART A. · 2002 to 2012
$6.1M
Fast Treadmill Training/Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve WalkingR01NR010786 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BINDER-MACLEOD, STUART A. · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
FORCE OPTIMIZATION IN SKELETAL MUSCLER01HD036797 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BINDER-MACLEOD, STUART A. · 1998 to 2005
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD36797NICHD NIH HHS HD38582NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036797NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038582NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During functional electrical stimulation (FES), both the frequency and intensity can be increased to increase muscle force output and counteract the effects of muscle fatigue. Most current FES systems, however, deliver a constant frequency and only vary the stimulation intensity to control muscle force. This study compared muscle performance and fatigue produced during repetitive electrical stimulation using three different strategies: (1) constant pulse-duration and stepwise increases in frequency (frequency-modulation); (2) constant frequency and stepwise increases in pulse-duration (pulse-duration-modulation); and (3) constant frequency and pulse-duration (no-modulation). Surface electrical stimulation was delivered to the quadriceps femoris muscles of 12 healthy individuals and isometric forces were recorded. Muscle performance was assessed by measuring the percent changes in the peak forces and force-time integrals between the first and the last fatiguing trains. Muscle fatigue was assessed by measuring percent declines in peak force between the 60Hz pre- and post-fatigue testing trains. The results showed that frequency-modulation showed better performance for both peak forces and force-time integrals in response to the fatiguing trains than pulse-duration-modulation, while producing similar levels of muscle fatigue. Although frequency-modulation is not commonly used during FES, clinicians should consider this strategy to improve muscle performance.

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMuscle FatigueMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID17317219
PMCPMC2562565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.