Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17316683›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2007

Towards fully automated structure-based function prediction in structural genomics: a case study.

James D Watson, Steve Sanderson, Alexandra Ezersky, Alexei Savchenko, Aled Edwards, Christine Orengo, Andrzej Joachimiak, Roman A Laskowski, Janet M Thornton

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional Prediction of Hypothetical Transcription Factors ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018
    Article
  6. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structure prediction of partial-length protein sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Protein Maker: an automated system for high-throughput parallel purification.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2011
    Article
  16. Maps of protein structure space reveal a fundamental relationship between protein structure and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. 1,000 structures and more from the MCSG.BMC structural biology · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James D WatsonEMBL--European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK. watson@ebi.ac.uk
Steve Sanderson
Alexandra Ezersky
Alexei Savchenko
Aled Edwards
Christine Orengo
Andrzej Joachimiak
Roman A Laskowski
Janet M Thornton

Funding

The Midwest Center for Structural GenomicsU54GM074942 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOACHIMIAK, ANDRZEJ · 2005 to 2009
$51.0M
THE MIDWEST CENTER FOR STRUCTURAL GENOMICSP50GM062414 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOACHIMIAK, ANDRZEJ JOACHIMIAK · 2000 to 2004
$33.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM62414NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM062414NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global Structural Genomics projects have picked up pace, the number of structures annotated in the Protein Data Bank as hypothetical protein or unknown function has grown significantly. A major challenge now involves the development of computational methods to assign functions to these proteins accurately and automatically. As part of the Midwest Center for Structural Genomics (MCSG) we have developed a fully automated functional analysis server, ProFunc, which performs a battery of analyses on a submitted structure. The analyses combine a number of sequence-based and structure-based methods to identify functional clues. After the first stage of the Protein Structure Initiative (PSI), we review the success of the pipeline and the importance of structure-based function prediction. As a dataset, we have chosen all structures solved by the MCSG during the 5 years of the first PSI. Our analysis suggests that two of the structure-based methods are particularly successful and provide examples of local similarity that is difficult to identify using current sequence-based methods. No one method is successful in all cases, so, through the use of a number of complementary sequence and structural approaches, the ProFunc server increases the chances that at least one method will find a significant hit that can help elucidate function. Manual assessment of the results is a time-consuming process and subject to individual interpretation and human error. We present a method based on the Gene Ontology (GO) schema using GO-slims that can allow the automated assessment of hits with a success rate approaching that of expert manual assessment.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinForecastingGenomicsProtein Structure, TertiarySequence Analysis, ProteinSoftware DesignStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID17316683
PMCPMC2566530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.