Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17315602›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2005

A critical dialogue: communicating with type 2 diabetes patients about cardiovascular risk.

Paris Roach, David Marrero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06837428 (Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06837428 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Peer Comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM): A Study Protocol to Evaluate the Feasibility of Delivering a Risk Communication Intervention in the Primary Care Setting for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetes Type 2ArmsPeer comparison-based Risk Communication (PRICOM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions of risks for diabetes-related complications in Type 2 diabetes populations: a systematic review.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Euthymia in Diabetes: Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Opinion from an International Expert Group.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019
    Review
  4. Exploring communications around medication review in community pharmacy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paris RoachDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. paroach@iupui.edu
David Marrero
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and many patients are inadequately treated for risk factors such as hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking. Providing individualized risk information in a clear and engaging manner may serve to encourage both patients and their physicians to intensify risk-reducing behaviors and therapies. This review outlines simple and effective methods for making CVD risk information understandable to persons of all levels of literacy and mathematical ability. To allow the patient to understand what might happen and how, personal risk factors should be clearly communicated and the potential consequences of a CVD event should be presented in a graphic but factual manner. Risk calculation software can provide CVD risk estimates, and the resulting information can be made understandable by assigning risk severity (eg, "high") by comparing clinical parameters with accepted treatment targets and by comparing the individual's risk with that of the "average" person. Patients must also be informed about how they might reduce their CVD risk and be supported in these efforts. Thoughtful risk communication using these techniques can improve access to health information for individuals of low literacy, especially when interactive computer technology is employed. Research is needed to find the best methods for communicating risk in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient Education as TopicCardiovascular DiseasesComprehensionComputer GraphicsDecision MakingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Educational StatusEvidence-Based MedicineHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysician-Patient RelationsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID17315602
PMCPMC1993965
OpenAlexW2093137365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.