Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17315540›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics

Estimation of hepatic distributional volumes using non-labeled reference markers.

Yasemin Karabey, Selma Sahin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasemin KarabeyHacettepe University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey.
Selma Sahin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatic distributional volumes were investigated in the in situ perfused rat liver. Perfusion experiments were conducted using Krebs bicarbonate buffer delivered via the portal vein in single-pass mode at a total flow rate of 15 mL/min. A bolus dose of normal erythrocytes (RBC, vascular marker) and Evans blue (EB, extracellular marker) respectively was administered in the presence and absence of protein. At the end of the experiment, liver total water content was determined by desiccation and freeze-drying methods. Similar moment analysis results and superimposable effluent curves were obtained in the presence (RBC, mean transit time [MTT]: 7.31 +/- 0.45 s and volume of distribution [V]: 0.17 +/- 0.01 mL/g; EB, MTT: 10.9 +/- 0.62 s and V: 0.25 +/- 0.02 mL/g) and in the absence (RBC, MTT: 7.55 +/- 0.84 s and V: 0.18 +/- 0.02 mL/g; EB, MTT: 9.24 +/- 0.77 s and V: 0.20 +/- 0.02 mL/g) of protein, which indicates that the hepatic distribution of RBC and EB within the liver is not influenced by protein. Furthermore, the almost identical results obtained with the desiccation and freeze-drying methods clearly suggest that the freeze-drying method can be used as an alternative to desiccation for the estimation of liver water content.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody Fluid CompartmentsDesiccationDye Dilution TechniqueErythrocytesEvans BlueFreeze DryingIndicator Dilution TechniquesIndicators and ReagentsInjections, IntravenousLiverMaleModels, BiologicalPerfusionPortal VeinProtein BindingEvans BlueIndicators and ReagentsSerum Albumin, BovineWater

Identifiers

PMID17315540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.