Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17314304›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2007

Sparse and selective odor coding by mitral/tufted neurons in the main olfactory bulb.

Ian G Davison, Lawrence C Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Amplification of Olfactory Transduction Currents Implements Sparse Stimulus Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Recalibrating Olfactory Neuroscience to the Range of Naturally Occurring Odor Concentrations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Dense and Persistent Odor Representations in the Olfactory Bulb of Awake Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biological constraints on configural odour mixture perception.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect of Interglomerular Inhibitory Networks on Olfactory Bulb Odor Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ian G DavisonHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. davison@neuro.duke.edu
Lawrence C Katz

Funding

Dendritic Remodeling in the Olfactory BulbR01DC005671 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian olfactory system recognizes an enormous variety of odorants carrying a wide range of important behavioral cues. In the main olfactory bulb (MOB), odorants are ultimately represented through the action potential activity of mitral/tufted cells (M/Ts), whose selectivity and tuning to odorant molecules are therefore fundamental determinants of MOB sensory coding. However, the sheer number and diversity of discrete olfactory stimuli has been a major barrier to comprehensively evaluating M/T selectivity. To address this issue, we assessed M/T odorant responses in anesthetized mice to a 348-odorant panel widely and systematically distributed throughout chemical space, presented both individually and in mixtures at behaviorally relevant concentrations. We found that M/T activation by odorants was markedly selective, with neurons responding robustly, sensitively, and reliably to only a highly restricted subset of stimuli. Multiple odorants activating a single neuron commonly shared clear structural similarity, but M/T tuning also frequently extended beyond obviously defined chemical categories. Cells typically responded to effective compounds presented both individually and in mixtures, although firing rates evoked by mixtures typically showed partial suppression. Response selectivity was further confirmed in awake animals by chronic recordings of M/Ts. These data indicate that individual M/Ts encode specific odorant attributes shared by only a small fraction of compounds and imply that the MOB relays the collective molecular features of an odorant stimulus through a restricted set of M/Ts, each narrowly tuned to a particular stimulus characteristic.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsChemical PhenomenaChemistryFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular StructureNeurons, AfferentOlfactory BulbSensory ThresholdsSmell

Identifiers

PMID17314304
PMCPMC6673545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.