Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17314226›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients.

Kimberly E Hanson, L Barth Reller, Joanne Kurtzberg, Mitchell Horwitz, Gwynn Long, Barbara D Alexander

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kimberly E HansonDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. kim.hanson@duke.edu
L Barth Reller
Joanne Kurtzberg
Mitchell Horwitz
Gwynn Long
Barbara D Alexander
Cellular Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBDuke University Hospital · USNHS Blood and Transplant · GBOffice of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Mentored Clinical Research Scholar ProgramK12RR017630 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMILTON, JOHN DAVID · 2002 to 2006
$2.9M
NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR017630NCRR NIH HHS RR17630-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Digene Hybrid Capture system cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests were compared using whole-virus standards and plasma specimens collected from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients. PCR assays showed better speed, sensitivity, and specificity.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralReagent Kits, DiagnosticAdultChildChild, PreschoolCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseHumansIndicators and ReagentsPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, HomologousViral ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, ViralIndicators and ReagentsReagent Kits, DiagnosticUL54 protein, Human herpesvirus 5Viral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17314226
PMCPMC1933098
OpenAlexW2113130404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.