ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2008
Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and child outcomes.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02215213 (Assessment of Dose Effectiveness of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 249 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Dose Effectiveness of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy
Who cites it
249 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 660 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Maternal vitamin D and growth of under-five children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and interventional studies.Global health action · 2022Pooled it
- The Gestational Effects of Maternal Bone Marker Molecules on Fetal Growth, Metabolism and Long-Term Metabolic Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- A Review on the Vagus Nerve and Autonomic Nervous System During Fetal Development: Searching for Critical Windows.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- Risk factors during first 1,000 days of life for carotid intima-media thickness in infants, children, and adolescents: A systematic review with meta-analyses.PLoS medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal vitamin D in humans: systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of vitamin D deficiency on neurobehavioural outcomes in children: a systematic review.Wellcome open research · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Vitamin D status during pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Early life vitamin D status and asthma and wheeze: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Vitamin D Status and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Pooled it
- Global summary of maternal and newborn vitamin D status - a systematic review.Maternal & child nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- Association between maternal nutritional status in pregnancy and offspring cognitive function during childhood and adolescence; a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2016Pooled it
- The Impact of Maternal Vitamin D Status on Offspring Brain Development and Function: a Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Pooled it
- Maternal and cord blood vitamin D status and childhood infection and allergic disease: a systematic review.Nutrition reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Vitamin D during pregnancy and maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2012Pooled it
- Trial
- Maternal antenatal vitamin D supplementation and offspring risk of atopic eczema in the first 4 years of life: evidence from a randomized controlled trial.The British journal of dermatology · 2022Trial
189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether exposure to high maternal concentrations of 25(OH)-vitamin D in pregnancy poses any risk to the child.
designProspective study.
settingPrincess Anne Maternity Hospital, Southampton, UK. SUBJECTS: A group of 596 pregnant women were recruited. A total of 466 (78%) children were examined at birth, 440 (74%) at age 9 months and 178 (30%) at age 9 years.
methodsMaternal 25 (OH)-vitamin D concentrations were measured in late pregnancy. Anthropometry of the child was recorded at birth, 9 months and 9 years. At 9 months, atopic eczema was assessed. At 9 years, children had an echocardiogram and a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan, blood pressure, arterial compliance and carotid intima-media thickness were measured and intelligence and psychological function assessed.
resultsThere were no associations between maternal 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations and the child's body size or measures of the child's intelligence, psychological health or cardiovascular system. Children whose mothers had a 25(OH)-vitamin D concentration in pregnancy >75 nmol/l had an increased risk of eczema on examination at 9 months (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.15-9.29, P=0.025) and asthma at age 9 years (OR 5.40, 95% CI, 1.09-26.65, P=0.038) compared to children whose mothers had a concentration of <30 nmol/l.
conclusionExposure to maternal concentrations of 25(OH)-vitamin D in pregnancy in excess of 75 nmol/l does not appear to influence the child's intelligence, psychological health or cardiovascular system; there could be an increased risk of atopic disorders, but this needs confirmation in other studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.