Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17309194›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2007

Synthesis and properties of size-expanded DNAs: toward designed, functional genetic systems.

Andrew T Krueger, Haige Lu, Alex H F Lee, Eric T Kool

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The expanded genetic alphabet.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Preparing synthetic biology for the world.Frontiers in microbiology · 2013
    Article
  15. A fluorescent reporter of ATP binding-competent receptor kinases.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. DNA-multichromophore systems.Chemical reviews · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Encoding phenotype in bacteria with an alternative genetic set.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew T KruegerDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Haige Lu
Alex H F Lee
Eric T Kool

Funding

RE-ENGINEERING THE DIAMETER OF THE DOULBE HELIXR01GM063587 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOOL, ERIC T. · 2001 to 2010
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 63587NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the design, synthesis, and properties of DNA-like molecules in which the base pairs are expanded by benzo homologation. The resulting size-expanded genetic helices are called xDNA ("expanded DNA") and yDNA ("wide DNA"). The large component bases are fluorescent, and they display high stacking affinity. When singly substituted into natural DNA, they are destabilizing because the benzo-expanded base pair size is too large for the natural helix. However, when all base pairs are expanded, xDNA and yDNA form highly stable, sequence-selective double helices. The size-expanded DNAs are candidates for components of new, functioning genetic systems. In addition, the fluorescence of expanded DNA bases makes them potentially useful in probing nucleic acids.

Indexed as

Base PairingBase SequenceBenzene DerivativesDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseFluorescenceMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, ChemicalNucleic Acid ConformationNucleic Acid ProbesSpectrometry, FluorescenceBenzene DerivativesDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseNucleic Acid Probes

Identifiers

PMID17309194
PMCPMC2539066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.