Trial reportCroatian medical journal2007
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and weaning of difficult-to-wean patients from mechanical ventilation: randomized prospective study.
Trial report in Croatian medical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05483244 (Weaning Success in Different Weaning Strategies in Early Neurological Rehabilitation Patients - a Matched-pair Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Weaning Success in Different Weaning Strategies in Early Neurological Rehabilitation Patients - a Matched-pair Analysis
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Spontaneous Breathing Trial Techniques for Extubating Adults and Children Who Are Critically Ill: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines.Acute and critical care · 2024Guideline
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of T-piece and pressure support ventilation as spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Trials directly comparing alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Pressure support versus T-tube for weaning from mechanical ventilation in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Methods of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Adult: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Effect of hypophosphatemia on the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Biomedical reports · 2016Article
- Can computer simulators accurately represent the pathophysiology of individual COPD patients?Intensive care medicine experimental · 2014Article
- Weaning of mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients by using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: A prospective study.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2014Article
- Does early use of bilevel positive airway pressure (bipap) in cardiothoracic intensive care unit prevent reintubation?International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare T-tube and pressure support ventilation (PSV) as two methods of mechanical ventilation weaning of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after failed extubation.
methodsA prospective randomized trial carried out at the multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) over 2 years included 136 patients with COPD who required mechanical ventilation longer than 24 hours. The patients who could be weaned from mechanical ventilation were randomized to either a T-tube or PSV 2-hour spontaneous breathing trial. The patients in whom 2-hour trial was successful were extubated and excluded from further research. Patients in whom 2-hour trial failed had mechanical ventilation reinstated and underwent the same weaning procedure after 24 hours in case they fulfilled the weaning criteria. The weaning outcome was assessed according to the following parameters: extubation success, mechanical ventilation duration, time spent in ICU, reintubation rate, and mortality rate.
resultsTwo-hour trial failed in 31 patients in T-tube and 32 patients in PSV group, of whom 17 and 23, respectively, were successfully extubated (P<0.001, chi(2)test). Mechanical ventilation lasted significantly longer in T-tube than in PSV group (187 hours vs 163 hours, respectively, P<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). Also, patients in T-tube group spent significantly more time in ICU than patients in PVS group (241 hours [interquartile range 211-268] vs 210 hours [211-268], respectively, P<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). Reintubation was required in 8 and 6 patients in T-tube and PVS group, respectively, and death occurred in 4 and 2 patients, respectively, during ICU stay.
conclusionPatients with COPD who failed the 2-hour spontaneous breathing trial had more favorable outcome when PVS rather than T-tube method was used for weaning from mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17309139PMC2080492W29407167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.