Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17308968›Full record

Trial reportPharmaceutical research2007

Levodopa slows progression of Parkinson's disease: external validation by clinical trial simulation.

Phylinda L S Chan, John G Nutt, Nicholas H G Holford

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmaceutical research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review of disease progression models of Parkinson's disease and applications in clinical trials.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Disease progression and neuroscience.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Targeting the progression of Parkinson's disease.Current neuropharmacology · 2009
    Article
  16. Protection against Parkinson's disease progression: clinical experience.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2008
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Phylinda L S ChanDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
John G Nutt
Nicholas H G Holford
University of Auckland · NZOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo externally validate the model predictions of a DATATOP cohort analysis through application of clinical trial simulation with the study design of the ELLDOPA trial.

methodsThe stochastic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and disease progress model was developed from the large DATATOP cohort of patients followed for 8 years. ELLDOPA was designed to detect a difference between placebo and levodopa treated arms in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) taken at baseline and following 2 weeks levodopa washout after 40 weeks of treatment. The total UPDRS response was simulated with different assumptions on levodopa effect (symptomatic with/without disease modifying capability) and washout speed of symptomatic effect.

resultsThe observed results of ELLDOPA were similar to the model predictions assuming levodopa slows disease progression and has a slow washout of symptomatic effect.

conclusionsThis simulation work confirmed the conclusion of the DATATOP analysis finding that levodopa slows disease progression. The simulation results also showed that a dose-related increased rate of progression in Parkinson's disease, obscured by symptomatic benefit, is very unlikely. Finally, the simulation results also shown that 2 weeks washout period was not adequate to completely eliminate the symptomatic benefits of levodopa.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalResearch DesignAntiparkinson AgentsCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansLevodopaParkinson DiseasePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID17308968
OpenAlexW1997273251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.