ArticleClinical drug investigation2007
Treatment of Parkinson's disease: a survey of patients and neurologists.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk Factors for Malnutrition in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature Based on Longitudinal Data.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Improved nutritional status is related to improved quality of life in Parkinson's disease.BMC neurology · 2014Trial
- Assessing healthcare resource utilization burden and unmet treatment needs in patients with Parkinson's disease: results from a real-world study.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Article
- Behavioural analysis of factors influencing prescribing for neurodegenerative diseases: A rapid review.PloS one · 2025Review
- Rationale and Development of Tavapadon, a D1/D5-Selective Partial Dopamine Agonist for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Treatment Satisfaction and Its Influencing Factors in Parkinson's Disease: A Web-Based Survey of Patients and Physicians in Clinical Practice in Japan.Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
- The Parkinson's Real-World Impact Assessment (PRISM) Study: A European Survey of the Burden of Parkinson's Disease in Patients and their Carers.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2021Observational
- "You have to know why you're doing this": a mixed methods study of the benefits and burdens of self-tracking in Parkinson's disease.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Patient and physician perceptions of disease management in Parkinson's disease: results from a US-based multicenter survey.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019Article
- Integrating Patient Concerns into Parkinson's Disease Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017Review
- Clinical variables associated with treatment changes in Parkinson's disease: results from the longitudinal phase of the REASON study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Drug Interactions in Parkinson's Disease: Safety of Pharmacotherapy for Arterial Hypertension.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2015Review
- Willingness to pay for a new drug delivery in Parkinson patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2014Article
- Current clinical practice for Parkinson's disease among Chinese physicians, general neurologists and movement disorders specialists: a national survey.BMC neurology · 2012Article
- Improving community healthcare for patients with Parkinson's disease: the dutch model.Parkinson's disease · 2012Article
- Measurement of patient-centered outcomes in Parkinson's disease: what do patients really want from their treatment?Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2011Article
- Challenges of treatment adherence in older patients with Parkinson's disease.Drugs & aging · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is complex and highly individual. The choice between available treatment options depends on clinical characteristics such as the patient's age, disease severity and presence of comorbidities, lifestyle characteristics and preferences, costs of different medications and awareness and perception of available treatment options, and education of the treating physician. The impact of PD treatment regimens on patients' health-related quality of life (QOL) is also an important healthcare feature. The objective of the present study was to assess treatment options, treatment satisfaction and opinions about treatment improvements in patients with PD and neurologists treating the disease.
methodsTwo surveys using face-to-face interviews and an additional phone survey were carried out in the US and five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK). Patients with early and advanced stages of PD were included. To participate in the neurologist survey, neurologists were required to personally treat ten or more PD patients per month, including both early and advanced stage patients. Interviews consisted of a mix of closed and open-ended questions; some of these questions involved show cards.
resultsOf the 500 patients who were surveyed, 49% had early and 51% had advanced PD. Early-stage PD patients, both in the US and Europe, take a mean of 3.2 tablets daily of PD-medication. In contrast, the mean daily tablet load of PD medication is much higher for advanced-stage patients (9.9 and 8.4 tablets in the US and Europe, respectively). Tablet load was perceived as a major problem; the majority of patients wished to see improvements regarding daily medication intake and expressed interest in other delivery systems such as patches. Overall, patients rated their treatment with a score of 6.6 points (6.7 for early-stage and 6.6 for advanced-stage patients) [scale of 1-10; 10 being highest]. Physicians (n = 592) were satisfied with a number of current PD medications and assumed they improve the QOL of the patients. They regarded efficacy and safety as the most important features for the improvement of PD medication.
conclusionFurther research is needed into PD treatment options not only for symptom alleviation but for better delivery systems that could improve compliance and QOL for patients with PD. Treatment guidelines need to incorporate QOL aspects and general communication between the health professional and the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17305415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.