ArticleInfection and immunity1992
Secretory immune responses to Mycoplasma pulmonis.
Article in Infection and immunity, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mycoplasmas as Host Pantropic and Specific Pathogens: Clinical Implications, Gene Transfer, Virulence Factors, and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Mucosal and systemic immune responses to a recombinant protein expressed on the surface of the oral commensal bacterium Streptococcus gordonii after oral colonization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Formalinized Mycoplasma pulmonis, along with aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant, was used to subcutaneously immunize rats in the vicinity of the salivary gland to examine the characteristics of the secretory immune response to this pathogen. The induction of specific antibody to this microorganism was detected in serum and the exocrine fluids, namely, saliva and lung lavage fluid. Both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA isotype antibodies were detected in each of these fluids after primary and secondary local immunizations. Serum responses from immunized animals were significantly greater than in the control group, but a dose response was not observed in either IgG or IgA antibody at the dosages selected for immunization. Salivary IgG antibody responses peaked early after both the primary and secondary immunizations, exhibiting a clear dose response. Salivary IgA in immunized groups was significantly greater than that in the control group but displayed little dose-dependent kinetics, and, at the termination of the experiment, this response had not yet peaked. Lung lavage IgG and IgA were minimal after the primary immunization when the antibody was normalized to total protein but displayed dose-dependent kinetics after a secondary challenge. IgG peaked immediately after a secondary challenge, while IgA peak responses were observed only after 20 days. A positive correlation was noted between the serum, saliva, and lung lavage fluid IgGs after both primary and secondary immunizations and only after a secondary challenge for IgA. In this study we were able to elicit a secretory immune response, consisting of both IgG and IgA, which exhibited a dose-dependent characteristic in lung lavage fluid to this immunogen. Additionally, a positive correlation of antibody levels between saliva and lung lavage fluid suggests that saliva could be used as an indicator for monitoring specific antibody to M. pulmonis in lung lavage secretions without requiring invasive, deleterious procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.