Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17301239›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Cannabinoid action in the olfactory epithelium.

Dirk Czesnik, Detlev Schild, Josko Kuduz, Ivan Manzini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of oral ΔEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drug-target based cross-sectional analysis of olfactory drug effects.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dirk CzesnikDepartment of Neurophysiology and Cellular Biophysics and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Center for Molecular Physiology of the Brain, University of Göttingen, Humboldtallee 23, 37073 Göttingen, Germany. dczesni@gwdg.de
Detlev Schild
Josko Kuduz
Ivan Manzini
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Neuronal cannabinoidsR01DA011322 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACKIE, KENNETH · 1998 to 2014
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS DA 11322NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of odors is influenced by a variety of neuromodulators, and there is growing evidence that modulation already takes place in the olfactory epithelium. Here we report on cannabinergic actions in the olfactory epithelium of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. First we show that CB1 receptor-specific antagonists AM251, AM281, and LY320135 modulate odor-evoked calcium changes in olfactory receptor neurons. Second, we localize CB1-like immunoreactivity on dendrites of olfactory receptor neurons. Finally, we describe the cannabinergic influence on odor-induced spike-associated currents in individual olfactory receptor neurons. Here we demonstrate that the cannabinergic system has a profound impact on peripheral odor processing and discuss its possible function.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCalcium SignalingCannabinoidsIn Vitro TechniquesLarvaOlfactory MucosaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Xenopus laevisAM 251CannabinoidsPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1

Identifiers

PMID17301239
PMCPMC1815290
OpenAlexW2070755870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.