Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17301208›Full record

ArticleQuality & safety in health care2007

Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia.

Glyn Elwyn, Diane Owen, Llinos Roberts, Kathie Wareham, Paul Duane, Miles Allison, Alan Sykes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Glyn ElwynDepartment of General Practice, Centre for Health Sciences Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. elwyng@cardiff.ac.uk
Diane Owen
Llinos Roberts
Kathie Wareham
Paul Duane
Miles Allison
Alan Sykes
Cardiff University · GBMorriston Hospital · GBSwansea University · GBRoyal Gwent Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemRising demand and increasing waiting times for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (gastroscopy).

designQuality improvement study with pre- and post-intervention data collection.

settingThree endoscopy units in two hospital trusts (Singleton, Morriston and Baglan Hospitals endoscopy units), UK. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Number of gastroscopy requests from general practitioners (GPs) and hospital doctors; their adherence to dyspepsia referral guidelines and the referral-to-procedure interval for upper gastroscopy. Data collected for six months before and for five months after the intervention. STRATEGY FOR CHANGE: Referrals were assessed against the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of dyspepsia by two part-time GPs and feedback sent to clinicians where requests did not adhere to the referrals criteria EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Adherence to guideline criteria increased significantly among GPs after the intervention (from 55% to 75%). There was no similar effect for hospital doctors, although their adherence rate (70%) was at a higher level than that of GPs before the intervention. The number of gastroscopy referrals for dyspepsia declined after the intervention, particularly from hospital doctors where a drop of 31% was observed, from 26.6 to 18.4 referrals per week. With the inclusion of seasonal effects, an estimated drop of 3.2 referrals per week from general practice was not significant (p = 0.065) while an estimated drop of 10.0 referrals per week for hospital doctors was very significant (p<0.001). LESSONS LEARNT: Referral assessment can be successfully introduced and shows promise as a way of improving the quality of referrals and reducing demand. Hospital clinicians are more resistant than GPs to referral assessment but nevertheless responded to the feedback by reducing their endoscopy gastroscopy requests. Most such referrals are generated in hospitals rather than in primary care: this finding has important implications for demand management.

Indexed as

FeedbackQuality Assurance, Health CareDyspepsiaFamily PracticeFemaleGastroscopyGuideline AdherenceHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID17301208
PMCPMC2464912
OpenAlexW2113916258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.