Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17301168›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2007

Opioid limbic circuit for reward: interaction between hedonic hotspots of nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum.

Kyle S Smith, Kent C Berridge

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 454 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The acute effects of nicotine on corticostriatal responses to distinct phases of reward processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Naloxone modulates visual judgments of similarity but not dissimilarity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2013
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hedonic hotspot in rat olfactory tubercle: map for mu-opioid, orexin, and muscimol enhancement of sucrose 'liking'.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  13. Optogenetic Hedonic Hotspots in the Orbitofrontal Cortex and Insula: Causing Enhancement of Sweetness "Liking".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyle S SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. kyless@umich.edu
Kent C Berridge
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms and Disorders - Administrative SupplementT32DC000011 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Michael Thomas Roberts · 1989 to 2026
$9.5M
Affective neuroscience of taste reactivityR01MH063649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2002 to 2024
$7.8M
Cue-triggered Reward SeekingR01DA015188 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2003 to 2021
$4.9M
NIDA NIH HHS DA015188NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015188NIDCD NIH HHS DC010011NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000011NIMH NIH HHS MH63649NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mu-opioid stimulation of cubic millimeter hedonic hotspots in either the nucleus accumbens shell (NAc) or the ventral pallidum (VP) amplifies hedonic "liking" reactions to sweetness and appetitive "wanting" for food reward. How do these two NAc-VP hotspots interact? To probe their interaction and limbic circuit properties, we assessed whether opioid activation of one hotspot recruited the other hotspot (neurobiologically) and whether opioid hedonic and incentive motivational amplification by either opioid hotspot required permissive opioid coactivation in the other (behaviorally). We found that NAc and VP hotspots reciprocally modulated Fos expression in each other and that the two hotspots were needed together to enhance sucrose "liking" reactions, essentially cooperating within a single hedonic NAc-VP circuit. In contrast, the NAc hotspot dominated for opioid stimulation of eating and food intake ("wanting"), independent of VP activation. This pattern reveals differences between limbic opioid circuits that control reward "liking" and "wanting" functions.

Indexed as

RewardAnalgesics, OpioidAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrug InteractionsEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Enkephalin, LeucineFeeding BehaviorGene Expression RegulationGlobus PallidusImmunohistochemistryMaleNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNeural PathwaysAnalgesics, OpioidEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Enkephalin, LeucineNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOncogene Proteins v-fos

Identifiers

PMID17301168
PMCPMC6673729
OpenAlexW2038105537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.