Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17300757›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2007

Selective reinforcement learning deficits in schizophrenia support predictions from computational models of striatal-cortical dysfunction.

James A Waltz, Michael J Frank, Benjamin M Robinson, James M Gold

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03068793 (Multimodal Neural Investigation of Reward Processing in Mental Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 200 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
200citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03068793 completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Neural Investigation of Reward Processing in Mental Illness

TypeobservationalSponsorSusanna FryerRan2013 to 2019Enrolled80ConditionsEarly-onset SchizophreniaArmsElectroencephalography (EEG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

200 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 331 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cognition and resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. NMDA receptor ablation in medial prefrontal cortex disrupts value updating and reward history integration.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

140 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James A WaltzMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21228, USA. jwaltz@mprc.umaryland.edu
Michael J Frank
Benjamin M Robinson
James M Gold
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

CORE--RESEARCH NETWORK DEVELOPMENT COREP30MH068580 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARPENTER, WILLIAM T. · 2003 to 2007
$7.9M
Clinical and Computational Studies of Dopamine Function in SchizophreniaR01MH080066 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GOLD, JAMES M. · 2008 to 2017
$6.4M
Dopaminergic Mechanisms of Reward in SchizophreniaR24MH072647 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI GOLD, JAMES M. · 2005 to 2007
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS 1R24 MH72647-01A1NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH068580NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH068580-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080066NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH072647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRewards and punishments may make distinct contributions to learning via separate striatal-cortical pathways. We investigated whether fronto-striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia (SZ) is characterized by selective impairment in either reward- (Go) or punishment-driven (NoGo) learning.

methodsWe administered two versions of a probabilistic selection task to 40 schizophrenia patients and 31 control subjects, using difficult to verbalize stimuli (experiment 1) and nameable objects (experiment 2). In an acquisition phase, participants learned to choose between three different stimulus pairs (AB, CD, EF) presented in random order, based on probabilistic feedback (80%, 70%, 60%). We used analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to assess the effects of group and reinforcement probability on two measures of contingency learning. To characterize the preference of subjects for choosing the most rewarded stimulus and avoiding the most punished stimulus, we subsequently tested participants with novel pairs of stimuli involving either A or B, providing no feedback.

resultsControl subjects demonstrated superior performance during the first 40 acquisition trials in each of the 80% and 70% conditions versus the 60% condition; patients showed similarly impaired (<60%) performance in all three conditions. In novel test pairs, patients showed decreased preference for the most rewarded stimulus (A; t = 2.674; p = .01). Patients were unimpaired at avoiding the most negative stimulus (B; t = .737).

conclusionsThe results of these experiments provide additional evidence for the presence of deficits in reinforcement learning in SZ, suggesting that reward-driven learning may be more profoundly impaired than punishment-driven learning.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAdultAntipsychotic AgentsBasal GangliaCognitionData Interpretation, StatisticalFeedbackFemaleHumansLearning DisabilitiesMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychomotor PerformanceReceptors, Dopamine D2Antipsychotic AgentsReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID17300757
PMCPMC2083701
OpenAlexW2082483237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.