ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2007
Stroke attributable to acute basilar occlusion.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Presence of Communicating Arteries in the Circle of Willis Is Associated with Higher Rate of Functional Recovery after Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- The Pathophysiology of Collateral Circulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Posterior circulation stroke: animal models and mechanism of disease.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute basilar artery occlusion carries a high risk of disabling stroke or death. Fast recanalization of the vessel is the mainstay of the therapy. Recanalization may be achieved by intravenous or intra-arterial administration of thrombolytics. These procedures are currently used as life-saving interventions, despite the low level of evidence supporting their efficacy, because of the bad prognosis of the disease. Intravenous thrombolysis may be started earlier, but it is less often used, mainly for historic reasons; intra-arterial measures are possibly more effective in achieving recanalization but require extra time before they can be started and demand a considerable amount of resources. The basilar artery does not recanalize in approximately one third of patients; this result has not been modified over the past two decades by these treatments and probably will not change. Combined mechanical and intra-arterial thrombolysis may be more efficient in achieving basilar artery recanalization, but the impact of this combined intervention on the final outcome has not been evaluated. Because time is critical, as in every stroke, implementation of a specific treatment protocol for this condition, including one of the aforementioned treatments, and eventual transfer to a secondary-care unit will save time and improve prognosis.
Identifiers
17298773What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.