Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17296962›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2007

Surrogate pregnancy: a guide for Canadian prenatal health care providers.

Dan R Reilly

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emotional experiences in surrogate mothers: A qualitative study.Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2014
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gestational surrogacy: Viewpoint of Iranian infertile women.Journal of human reproductive sciences · 2011
    Article
  5. The body, emotions and intentions: challenges of preconception arrangements for health care providers.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan R ReillyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. dreilly@mcmaster.ca
McMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing health care for a woman with a surrogate pregnancy involves unique challenges. Although the ethical debate surrounding surrogacy continues, Canada has banned commercial, but not altruistic, surrogacy. In the event of a custody dispute between a surrogate mother and the individual(s) intending to parent the child, it is unclear how Canadian courts would rule. The prenatal health care provider must take extra care to protect the autonomy and privacy rights of the surrogate. There is limited evidence about the medical and psychological risks of surrogacy. Whether theoretical concerns about these risks are clinically relevant remains unknown. In the face of these uncertainties, the prenatal health care provider should have a low threshold for seeking obstetrical, social work, ethical and legal support.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicCanadaFemaleGestational CarriersHumansInfant, NewbornInfant WelfareMaternal Health ServicesMaternal WelfarePersonal AutonomyPolicy MakingPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID17296962
PMCPMC1800554
OpenAlexW1983280196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.