Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17296740›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

Fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio and resistance development with gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin.

Kerry L LaPlante, Michael J Rybak, Brian Tsuji, Thomas P Lodise, Glenn W Kaatz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gemifloxacin use in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2009
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kerry L LaPlanteAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Ave., Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Michael J Rybak
Brian Tsuji
Thomas P Lodise
Glenn W Kaatz
Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USDetroit Receiving Hospital · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential for resistance development in Streptococcus pneumoniae secondary to exposure to gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin at various levels was examined at high inoculum (10(8.5) to 10(9) log10 CFU/ml) over 96 h in an in vitro pharmacodynamic (PD) model using two fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. The pharmacokinetics of each drug was simulated to provide a range of free areas under the concentration-time curves (fAUC) that correlated with various fluoroquinolone doses. Potential first (parC and parE)- and second-step (gyrA and gyrB) mutations in isolates with raised MICs were identified by sequence analysis. PD models simulating fAUC/MICs of 51 and<or=60, 34 and 37, <or=82 and<or=86, and<or=24 for gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively, against each isolate were associated with first-step parC (S52G, S79Y, and N91D) and second-step gyrA (S81Y and S114G) mutations. For each fluoroquinolone a delay of first- and second-step mutations was observed with increasingly higher fAUC/MIC ratios and recovery of topoisomerase mutations in S. pneumoniae was related to the fAUC/MIC exposure. Clinical doses of gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin exceeded the fAUC/MIC resistance breakpoint against wild-type S. pneumoniae, whereas those of levofloxacin (500 and 750 mg) were associated with first- and second-step mutations. The exposure breakpoints for levofloxacin were significantly different (P<0.001) from those of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Additionally, moxifloxacin breakpoints were significantly lower (P<0.002) than those of gatifloxacin. The order of resistance development determined from fAUC/MIC breakpoints was levofloxacin>gatifloxacin>moxifloxacin=gemifloxacin, which may be related to structural differences within the class.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveAza CompoundsDrug Resistance, BacterialFluoroquinolonesGatifloxacinGemifloxacinLevofloxacinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinNaphthyridinesOfloxacinPneumococcal InfectionsQuinolinesStreptococcus pneumoniaeAza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesGatifloxacinGemifloxacinLevofloxacinMoxifloxacinNaphthyridinesOfloxacinQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID17296740
PMCPMC1855487
OpenAlexW2112241774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.