ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2007
Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasound: is there a learning curve?
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and clinical staging for those with rectal malignancies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2017Article
- Role of ultrasound in colorectal diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016Review
- Rectal Tumour Staging with Endorectal Ultrasound: Is There Any Difference between Western and Eastern European Countries?Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
- Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2016Article
- Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: where are we going?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Time-intensity curve parameters in rectal cancer measured using endorectal ultrasonography with sterile coupling gels filling the rectum: correlations with tumor angiogenesis and clinicopathological features.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- [Impact of endoscopy and endosonography on local staging of rectal carcinoma].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012Review
- Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?Techniques in coloproctology · 2011Article
- The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.Surgical endoscopy · 2010Article
- Role of tumor size in the pre-operative management of rectal cancer patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2010Article
- How useful is rectal endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer?World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Review
- Confocal chromolaser endomicroscopy: a supplemental diagnostic tool prior to transanal endoscopic microsurgery of rectal tumors?International journal of colorectal disease · 2010Article
- Staging anal cancer: prospective comparison of transanal endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2009Article
- Endorectal ultrasound: its role in the diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEndorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is becoming an essential tool in the management of rectal cancer. However, accuracy in the assessment of disease staging may be dependent on operator experience. The aim of this study was to determine if a learning curve exists. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom October 1999 to December 2004, all patients with rectal cancer had a pre-operative ERUS performed by a single radiologist. ERUS staging was compared with post-operative pathology findings using the tumour, node, metastases (TNM) classification. The accuracy of ERUS in tumour (T) and node (N) staging after each additional consecutive ten patients was calculated.
resultsOne hundred and thirty one patients were investigated by ERUS, of which 36 were excluded, leaving 95 patients in the study (60 men). Overall accuracy for T staging was 71.6%. No improvement with experience was noted (p > 0.05). With regard to T staging, ERUS tended to overstage more frequently than understage (24.2 versus 4.2%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of uT3 staging were 96.6, 33.3, 70.4 and 85.7%, respectively. Overall accuracy of uN staging was 68.8%. ERUS tended to overstage nodal disease more frequently than understage (16.1 versus 15.1%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated for ultrasound-detected nodal disease (73.2, 62.2, 74.5 and 60.5%, respectively). Nodal staging accuracy improved from 50% after assessment of 10 cases to 77% after 30 cases were examined.
conclusionsERUS is an accurate method for staging rectal cancer pre-operatively. Accurate assessment of tumour stage can be achieved immediately by an experienced radiologist without specific training in ERUS. Nodal staging accuracy tends to improve with experience but reaches a plateau after 30 cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.