Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17294152›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2007

[Conservative treatment of male stress incontinence].

S Buse, A Reitz, A Haferkamp, M Hohenfellner

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S BuseUrologische Universitätsklinik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69121, Heidelberg, Deutschland. stephan.buse@med.uni-heidelberg.de
A Reitz
A Haferkamp
M Hohenfellner
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of male patients affected by stress incontinence developed this disturbance after radical prostatectomy or less frequently after TURP. Urodynamic evaluation shows sphincter insufficiency in more than 90% of the patients. The conservative therapy of postprostatectomy stress incontinence relies on physical methods, namely, pelvic floor muscle training with or without electrical or magnetic stimulation. However, evidence in favor of one or the other approach is limited. Since publication of the positive results with duloxetine in women, interest in medical therapy for men reporting postoperative stress incontinence has increased. Conclusive evidence in favor of duloxetine for prostatectomy-associated incontinence however is still missing.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesDuloxetine HydrochlorideElectric Stimulation TherapyGermanyHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'ProstatectomySelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsThiophenesUrinary Incontinence, StressDuloxetine HydrochlorideSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID17294152
OpenAlexW118931708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.