Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17293456›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Distinct modes of action applied by transcription factors STAT1 and IRF1 to initiate transcription of the IFN-gamma-inducible gbp2 gene.

Katrin Ramsauer, Matthias Farlik, Gordin Zupkovitz, Christian Seiser, Andrea Kröger, Hansjörg Hauser, Thomas Decker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Analysis of the Transcriptional Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Transcriptional control of interferon-stimulated genes.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrin RamsauerMax F. Perutz Laboratories, Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, University of Vienna, A1030 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias Farlik
Gordin Zupkovitz
Christian Seiser
Andrea Kröger
Hansjörg Hauser
Thomas Decker
Max Perutz Labs · ATGerman Respiratory Society · DEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 2803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subgroup of genes induced by IFN-gamma requires both STAT1 and IRF1 for transcriptional activation. Using WT, stat1(-/-), or irf1(-/-) cells, we analyzed the changes induced by IFN-gamma in gbp2 promoter chromatin. STAT1 associated with the promoter independently of IRF1 and played an essential role in the ordered recruitment of the coactivator/histone acetyl transferase CREB-binding protein (CBP) and the histone deacetylase HDAC1. Hyperacetylation of histone 4 also required STAT1. Phosphorylation at S727 in the transactivating domain increased transcriptional activity of STAT1. In cells expressing a STAT1S727A-mutant CBP recruitment, histone 4 hyperacetylation and RNA polymerase II association with the gbp2 promoter were strongly reduced. IRF1 association with the gbp2 promoter followed that of STAT1, but STAT1 association with DNA or histone hyperacetylation were not necessary for IRF1 binding. RNA polymerase II association with the gbp2 promoter required both STAT1 and IRF1, suggesting that both proteins mediate essential steps in transcriptional activation. IRF1, but not STAT1, was found to coimmunoprecipitate with RNA polymerase II. Together, the data support the assumption that the main role of STAT1 in activating gbp2 transcription is to provide transcriptionally competent chromatin, whereas the function of IRF1 may lie in directly contacting RNA polymerase II-containing transcriptional complexes.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinGenes, RegulatorGTP-Binding ProteinsInterferon-gammaInterferon Regulatory Factor-1MiceMutationPhosphorylationPhosphoserinePromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IISTAT1 Transcription FactorChromatinGbp2b protein, mouseGbp2 protein, mouseGTP-Binding ProteinsInterferon-gammaInterferon Regulatory Factor-1Irf1 protein, mousePhosphoserineRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IIStat1 protein, mouseSTAT1 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID17293456
PMCPMC1815270
OpenAlexW2169121410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.